Titre du document

PHYSICS AND REALITY

Lien vers le document
Nom du Corpus

AstroConcepts

Auteur(s)
  • Mario Bunge
Affiliation(s)
  • Delaware, U.S.A
Résumé

A semantical and methodological analysis of physical theories is performed in order to find out their relation to reality and to human experience. It is shown that every physical theory refers immediately to an idealized model of waht is supposed to be a piece of reality?the mediate referent of the theory. Two kinds of physical interpretation of physical symbols are distinguished : objective and operational, and the difference between reference and evidence is stressed. It is claimed that for a theory to be physically meaningful it is necessary that it includes rules of objective reference. In some cases a theory contains, in addition, evidential reference rules, i.e. correspondences between some of its concepts and empirical items. But the test. of any theory requires, rather than operational rules, further theories that can bridge the gap between what the theory refers to (e.g., the passage of a cosmic ray) and its remote symptom (e.g., the click of a counter). The conditions for the semantical consistency are sketched and it is argued that there does not exist a semantically consistency inter?pretation of any of the formalisms of quantum theory. From this analysis arguments in favor of critical realism are drawn.

Langue(s) du document
Anglais
Année de publication
1965
Revue

Dialectica

Éditeur
Wiley
Type de publication
journal
Type de document
article
Présence de XML structuré
Non
Version de PDF
1.4
Score de qualité du texte
9.364
Nom du concept
  • Magnetic monopole
Catégories Science-Metrix
  • 1 - arts & humanities ; 2 - philosophy & theology ; 3 - philosophy
Catégories Inist
  • 1 - sciences humaines et sociales
Catégories Scopus
  • 1 - Social Sciences ; 2 - Arts and Humanities ; 3 - Philosophy
Identifiant ISTEX
596B06D508EE250E885344FC9CA88C575705F048
ark:/67375/WNG-H7ND04RQ-L
Powered by Lodex 9.4.5